So The Childfree Should Not Speak on Parental Issues? Seriously?
Britgirl | January 29, 2010 | 12:03 amIs it me or does Australia come across as more “anti-childfree” than most places in the Western world? Seems that whenever I read something touching on childfree-ness or non-parenting (or respect for either) there is something negative about it. It’s not that there isn’t negativity towards the childfree elsewhere… we aren’t yet at that particular utopia.
It’s more that it appears Australian Governmental figures (who are supposed to be there to govern everyone, right?) like to take pot-shots at other Government persons who don’t have children. Actually, taking pot-shots is putting it mildly… in many cases they make no effort to hide their derision for women (and it’s always women) who are childfree.
Take this story for example:
Childless Gillard can’t speak on parental issues
To quote the article, which is chock-full of insults which frankly say more about the front bencher than the person he’s is denigrating:
“LIBERAL frontbencher George Brandis has questioned Julia Gillard’s ability to “understand the way parents think” about virginity because she doesn’t have children. Defending Tony Abbott’s right to discuss the advice he gave to his daughters on virginity, Senator Brandis said the Deputy Prime Minister was a “one-dimensional” person who had “chosen not to be a parent”.
“One dimenensional person?”
“Unable to understand the way parents think about virginity?” because “ this one dimensional person had chosen not to be a parent?”
This isn’t too long after another Australian Liberal politician accused the same childfree politician – Gillard – as being “deliberately barren.” Bad enough when this comes from total strangers. When it comes from so-called politicians?
It seems that not only does he not like childfree women, he also sees them as less than fit for politics. Clearly women have nothing of value to say unless they “have chosen to be a parent.”
But we’d be naive if we thought that kind of thinking was confined to certain Australian politicians. Plenty of parents think that the childfree have no business talking about “child or parent related things” because we don’t have children. ourselves.
I disagree. What do you think?










. For the childfree this season can be especially trying. Getting together with family can be good… or it can be like treading on eggshells as we childfree dodge questions as to when we’re going to reproduce (and do our duty to country, parent and the world at large) whether well-meaning or not. Or we get the “Oh, but Christmas is for kids!” effectively trying to negate our ability to get any joy out of the season without kids to buy (expensive) presents for. Who’d be a parent, when balancing the budget or going into more debt to buy that iphone for 10 year-old Johnny is top of the list? Do kids like simple toys these days? You know, like Lego, musical boxes… BB Guns?![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=528e147a-6fa3-432f-88da-c92b07bfde90)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=0356847c-a412-4565-a95f-7dc60b6db285)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f54f167a-3621-4cce-b928-f5e976756df7)









Just in case you were not aware! It feels like my sons were born yesterday, but today, I look UPwards to talk to my oldest, and I can’t tell you how COOL that feels! : ) But you ‘ll never have that gratification……to each his or her own!”