<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogger Sued For Posting Topless Aniston Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebritgirl.com/2007/02/22/blogger-sued-for-posting-topless-aniston-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebritgirl.com/2007/02/22/blogger-sued-for-posting-topless-aniston-photos/</link>
	<description>The Interests of a Childfree Brit Living in Toronto</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Britgirl</title>
		<link>http://thebritgirl.com/2007/02/22/blogger-sued-for-posting-topless-aniston-photos/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Britgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 03:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebritgirl.com/2007/02/22/blogger-sued-for-posting-topless-aniston-photos/#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>Yes, Mosh, but the question is do they also like topless celebs...surely not! LOL.  Actually, I think he would relish the publicity. He certainly is no stranger to controversy.  I was reading today that hits to his site were into the millions.  I don't think it would have drawn that much attention (or a law suit) if it wasn't topless photos of Aniston.... and that he had to use stolen (allegedly) photos which he then removes tells me he knew it might have this very effect. But Aniston sued someone else a little while ago who took photos of her (topless again) and they settled.  So, maybe he has the readies anyway.

mercurior - I think they are trying to make a point by suing him, since he didn't learn from the photographer-takes-topless-photo-and-settles incident :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Mosh, but the question is do they also like topless celebs&#8230;surely not! LOL.  Actually, I think he would relish the publicity. He certainly is no stranger to controversy.  I was reading today that hits to his site were into the millions.  I don&#8217;t think it would have drawn that much attention (or a law suit) if it wasn&#8217;t topless photos of Aniston&#8230;. and that he had to use stolen (allegedly) photos which he then removes tells me he knew it might have this very effect. But Aniston sued someone else a little while ago who took photos of her (topless again) and they settled.  So, maybe he has the readies anyway.</p>
<p>mercurior - I think they are trying to make a point by suing him, since he didn&#8217;t learn from the photographer-takes-topless-photo-and-settles incident <img src='http://thebritgirl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mosh</title>
		<link>http://thebritgirl.com/2007/02/22/blogger-sued-for-posting-topless-aniston-photos/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>Mosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebritgirl.com/2007/02/22/blogger-sued-for-posting-topless-aniston-photos/#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>I reckong a trial by jury would be to his advantage.  My gut feeling is that the general public would sympathise with him.  The public loves gossip about celebs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckong a trial by jury would be to his advantage.  My gut feeling is that the general public would sympathise with him.  The public loves gossip about celebs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercurior</title>
		<link>http://thebritgirl.com/2007/02/22/blogger-sued-for-posting-topless-aniston-photos/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>mercurior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebritgirl.com/2007/02/22/blogger-sued-for-posting-topless-aniston-photos/#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>all publicity is good publicity, apparently.  see naked celeb pics, well celebrities are there to sell their bodies,  and skills, acting etc.. 

but its not the celebrity thats complaining its the people who produced the film, trying to keep as much control over every image sound bite they make.

these kind of cases only show that the film producers the big studios, are insecure bullies in my opinion.  what does it matter 1 site does this image,  so you will have a multi million dollar law practice, focused on one small individual. 

talk about freedom of speech,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all publicity is good publicity, apparently.  see naked celeb pics, well celebrities are there to sell their bodies,  and skills, acting etc.. </p>
<p>but its not the celebrity thats complaining its the people who produced the film, trying to keep as much control over every image sound bite they make.</p>
<p>these kind of cases only show that the film producers the big studios, are insecure bullies in my opinion.  what does it matter 1 site does this image,  so you will have a multi million dollar law practice, focused on one small individual. </p>
<p>talk about freedom of speech,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
