Childfree? What Happens to Your Friendships?

25 08 2008

Some time ago a reader wrote to me about one aspect of being childfree that I’m sure affects most of us who’ve taken the road less traveled. And that is the sea-change that happens as former friends join the ranks of parents (and by default, societal acceptability) leaving you, the childfree person “on the outside.”

Even when you try to maintain friendships it can be hard. Suddenly the talk is about babies, children, parenting. Whether the conversation is about “how wonderful motherhood is – and you should have a baby” or “how hard it all is – I’m constantly tired,” the result is the same. Your interests are no longer common and your paths have diverged forever. Even if the childed friend wants to do things with you, the demands of parenting will always come first

This can be quite serious for the childfree person. From having friends you grew up with or went to school with, suddenly you have to try and find new childfree friendships, which in most cases can be difficult. Friendships are formed for many different reasons, but one thing that’s always there is a kind of chemistry. While joining social groups for childfree people are one way to meet like-minded people, it doesn’t guarantee the same chemistry.

Or does it?

I am fortunate in that my closest friends are also childfree. We don’t get to see each other as much as we’d like, but that’s because they live in England and I’m in Canada. But when we do get together there’s no having to ask about any kid questions. I’ve also made friends with people who either already have older children (and don’t talk about them incessantly) and other people who are childfree through No Kidding. And I do believe the pressure of having to find childfree friends is less for those who are married to, or in a partnership with another childfree person. At least, it is for me.

Of recent a good friend who was also a colleague had a baby. Since I never bring up kid questions they never came up. But now I find myself almost obliged to ask about the baby, how she’s doing etc, etc. Some might say, well if you care about her you’d care about her new life as a mother which means you’d be interested in her baby. The fact is, it’s hard for me to show any interest in babies… I’m simply not interested, certainly not in the way I’m expected to be. Because we don’t see each that often, it’s not the same as if it were a very close friend.. but still, it got me thinking. I know that friendship has changed for ever.

And of course the greatest number of childfree friends I have are online. They’re the people who “get it” and who really share their childfree lives – particularly on this blog.

What about you? Have you had to find new friendships when former friends go off to have kids? Or has it never been an issue? If you’ve made new friendships how did you do it? What advice (if any) do you have for other childfree people?

As always, share your views here.

Technorati Tags: ,




Bush Redefining Contraception As Abortion.

18 08 2008

Everyone should be concerned about this sneaky back-door attempt to interfere with women’s reproductive rights, whether they are childfree or not. But for the childfree and those who may not want to reproduce it’s even more important.

Bush Redefining Contraception as Abortion

Though this is about “Plan B” (What’s also called the Morning After Pill) rather than all contraception, the result is the same and it is a slippery slope. Chipping away at women’s rights to determine whether or not they want to have children. Changing the rules by the back door. Removing access to birth control, and at the same time refusing tubal ligations and vasectomies to women and men who want them until they’ve added to the gene pool.

Note the collusion with the Religious Right in this when you read what last-gasp Bush is doing and think of how it’s going to give the “Pro-Lifers” more freedom than ever.

This is scary, crazy stuff, being brought in on the sly while everyone is supposedly distracted by the elections. I’d sign the petition in a flash (I tried) but it’s for US Citizens. So, here’s what you can do.

  1. Read the article
  2. Sign the petition
  3. Share the link on your blog or Facebook or MySpace or other profiles, and make as many people aware as possible so they can sign the petition.
  4. Comment – here and on the blog

SBK – Thanks for flagging.

I just hope Americans are listening and aware because they need to be vigilant. Anyone who thinks women’s reproduction rights aren’t under systematic and consistent attack is dreaming.

Bush Redefining Contraception as Abortion

Technorati Tags:




The Childfree Lose Out… Again

11 08 2008

Once again the Childfree get royally shafted. The unpopular Gordon Brown clearly seems to be living on a completely different planet from the rest of us, but that hasn’t stopped him from electioneering in grand style – if this story is to be believe. The fact that it came from an overheard conversation on a train might make one pause for thought, but the times story has garnered over 100 comments already. Check them out

Gordon Brown plans GBP150 bonus for parents.

Basically, Gordon Brown is planning on paying GBP 150 bonus (about $350) to everyone who currently received child benefit. Child benefit is paid to all families with children under 16 and older teenagers in full-time education. Around 7.5 million families. If this isn’t an electioneering bribe from a deeply unpopular PM I don’t know what it is. The bonus is meant to be a response to soaring fuel bills in the UK of recent. I have no issue with child benefit – it isn’t going away any time soon. But why should it be only these families who get a one-off bonus to offset high fuel bills. Presumably those who don’t have children don’t feel the costs of soaring fuel bills.

Injustice? Discriminatory? The clearest message yet that only those with children are deemed worthy of assistance. Either that or their votes are easily bought. If you’re single, childfree or if you’ve simply realised that having children is expensive and decided not to have them. Too bad – you’re going to be paying for other people to whom affordability of children never ranked in their decision to have them.

Lest we forget where GB will be getting this “one-off bonus” payment for the childed… it will be from your average tax payers. And with no dependents, no government benefits, no tax breaks and few, if any, perks (in other words self-sufficient working people) not only are we also paying for soaring full bills, and everything else, taxes are about to go up again. The money has to come from somewhere.

I’d say that Gordon Brown has stooped to a new low, but he hasn’t really. Every politician knows that when it comes to saving your political skin, a middle class “family-friendly” bribe never goes amiss. Childfree? Single? Pensioner? Too bad.

As Lisa from Newcastle said…

“What? I don’t have children, I am currently paying for others through my ridiculously high taxes and now I have to foot a bill for a further £150? When will there be a tax break/incentive for those who work themselves to the ground to just afford the roof over their ’single’ heads? Start with fuel…”

The best thing about the Times Online article? The fact that so many people who do not have children felt moved to comment on this latest and most stupid government bribe.

Gordon Brown plans GBP150 bonus for parents

Technorati Tags:




Stop The World. Don’t Do Another Thing. Don’t Even Dare Die Until…

3 08 2008

…you’ve beheld the 8th and 9th wonders of the world. Twins!

It’s a funny old world, methinks. But these two posts from D-Listed made me laugh. And so of course I had to share it with you, wonderful childfree readers. For today is definitely not your day. No-one cares about you, because the eyes of the world (well, a good portion of it) are turned heaven-wards – sorry website and magazine-wards with feverish anticipation. I mean, it’s been on the International NEWS, dammit! Today is the day for the Brangelina Loons. Today’s the day that the $15million pics of the TWIN messiahs get released to the world.  (US$ 15 million for pictures of babies ???!!). Faarrk! 

Some are going potty (no pun intended, honest) with anticipation, cancelling everything except the most urgent bodily functions to be the first to gaze upon the golden babies. Clearly, these are no mere babies, right?

Get the scoop here:

Sunday Is The Most Important Day Of Your Life

 I really can’t add any more to it except to say I enjoyed it hugely. Thank God for some sane irreverence. Here’s an excerpt to whet your taste-buds:

“Yes, it’s true. People Magazine won the exclusive rights for the first pictures of Brangelina’s chosen twins. It’s rumored that they paid around $10 to $15 million, a record. Of course, the money is going to charity. I think the name of the charity is the “We’re Fucking Saints And You Know It Fund.

Actually, it’s more likely Monday will be the crazy day. Since that’s when the Brangeloonies (love that name) will  officially be in raptures. Or perhaps they’ll have experienced the rapture after gazing worshipfully upon the blessed ones. Simply brangiful. Sigh.

And, don’t forget to read this one too.

My Eyes!!!

Better get down on your knees and get those dark glasses on. The light will be truly blinding. You’ve been warned.

Wonder if the Brangeloonies would like frankincense and myrrh with that…

Technorati Tags: